This is America's Tunisian Moment: a man set upon by the beast-as we all are-is backed into a corner and does something desperate. Mind you, suicide is never the answer... his own death(?)... but something's to be said about the fucking lawyers and unarmed American murdering tin badge god oath traitors when a man decides going out like that Tunisian fruit vendor's preferable to jail.
He should have set THEM on fire.
Read this: http://www.sentinelsource.com/news/local/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/sentinelsource.com/news/local/last-statement-sent-to-sentinel-from-self-immolation-victim/article_cd181c8e-983b-11e0-a559-001cc4c03286.html
Last Statement
by Tom Ball
A man walks up to the main door of the Keene N.H. County
Courthouse, douses himself with gasoline and lights a match. And
everyone wants to know why.
Apparently the old general was right. Death is not the worst of
evil.
I am due in court the end of the month. The ex-wife lawyer wants
me jailed for back child support. The amount ranges from $2,200. to
$3,000. depending on who you ask. Not big money after being
separated over ten years and unemployed for the last two. But I do
owe it. If I show up for court without the money and the lawyer say
jail, then the judge will have the bailiff take me into custody.
There really are no surprises on how the system works once you know
how it actually works. And it does not work anything like they
taught you in high school history or civics class.
I could have made a phone call or two and borrowed the money.
But I am done being bullied for being a man. I cannot believe these
people in Washington are so stupid to think they can govern
Americans with an iron fist. Twenty-five years ago, the federal
government declared war on men. It is time now to see how committed
they are to their cause. It is time, boys, to give them a taste of
war.
There are two kinds of bureaucrats you need to know; the ones
that say and the ones that do. The bridge between them is something
I call The Second Set of Books. I have some figures of the success
of their labors. You and I are in these numbers, as well as our
spouses and children. But first let me tell you how I ended up in
this rabbit hole.
My story starts with the infamous slapping incident of April
2001. While putting my four year old daughter to bed, she began
licking my hand. After giving her three verbal warnings I slapped
her. She got a cut lip. My wife asked me to leave to calm things
down.
(Okay, he acted stupidly and should have just left. I am against child abuse but this is forgivable)
When I returned hours later, my wife said the police were by and
said I could not stay there that night. The next day the police
came by my work and arrested me, booked me, and then returned me to
work. Later on Peter, the parts manager, asked me if I and the old
lady would be able to work this out. I told him no. I could not
figure out why she had called the police. And bail condition
prevented me from asking her. So I no longer trusted her
judgment.
After six months of me not lifting a finger to save this
marriage, she filed for divorce. Almost two years after the
incident, I was talking with her on the phone. She told me that
night she had called a mental health provider we had for one of the
kids. Wendy, the counselor told my then wife that if she did not
call the police on me, then she too would be arrested.
Suddenly, everything made sense. She is the type that believes
that people in authority actually know what they are talking about.
If both she and I were arrested, what would happen to our three
children, ages 7,4 and 1? They would end up in State custody. So my
wife called the police on her husband to protect the children. And
who was she protecting the kids from? Not her husband, the father
of these children. She was protecting them from the State of New
Hampshire.
This country is run by idiots.
The police sergeant Freyer screwed this up from the get go. When
I got the Court Complaint form the box was checked that said
Domestic Violence Related. I could not believe that slapping your
child was domestic violence. So I looked up the law. Minor
custodial children are exempted. Apparently, 93% of American
parents still spank, slap or pinch their children. To this day I
still wonder if Freyer would have made this arrest if it had been
the mother that had slapped the child.
Labeling someone's action as domestic violence in American in
the 21st century is akin to labeling someone a Jew in Germany in
the 1930's. The entire legal weight of the state is coming down on
him. But I consider myself lucky. My family was destroyed. But that
poor bastard in Germany had his family literally annihilated.
Arrests are mandatory for the police in New Hampshire for
domestic violence. That is not law. That is police department
policy. Laws come from the Legislature and the Governor's office
together. God only knows where these policies come from. The
State's Attorney General also has a mandatory arrest protocol for
domestic violence. I call these policies, procedures and protocols
The Second Set of Books. You never cover the Second Set of Books
your junior year in high school. That because we are not suppose to
have a Second Set of Books. This is America-we have the rule of
law.
I am a regular guy, a coffee and cheeseburger type of fellow. As
remarkable as my life has been, I figure that what happens to me
must be happening to others as well. I was 48 years old when I got
arrested here for my first time. So I went looking for the arrest
numbers for domestic violence, this new group that I had unwilling
joined. I could not find anything. So I wrote the U.S. Dept. of
Justice in Washington. They wrote back that they did not keep track
of domestic violence arrests. The FBI keeps track of all other
crimes. How come not domestic violence? I thought some low level
clerk was blowing me off.
At the time, I had mailing addresses in both New Hampshire and
Massachusetts. So I wrote to all six Congressional offices, the two
Senators from each state and the two Congressman. They like doing
favors for constituents hoping you will favorably remember their
name in the voting booth. All six offices reported back the same
thing. They do not know how many arrests for domestic violence have
been made. I immediately knew something was wrong. And I also knew
this was not going to be good.
Improvise, adapt and overcome. The Army teaches that to every
soldier it trains. They say that no battle plan survives the first
five minutes of combat. So your people on the ground had better be
able to think for themselves. Taking casualties in war is just an
occupational hazard. Taking casualties and not accomplishing your
mission is a disaster. After 21 years of Army service, I am pretty
good at improvising.
The first thing I found was a study not of domestic violence
arrests but of domestic violence injuries for 18 unnamed states and
the D.C. in the year 2000. In the study 51% of the injuries were
'no injuries'. So I knew I had a study of police reports. Who else
but a police officer would record no injuries? I populated that out
to the 50 states and came up with 874,000 arrest in the year
2000.
I had originally populated the number back to 1994 when the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was enacted into law. I would
later find out these arrests stated with the U.S. Attorney
General's Task Force of Domestic Violence ten years earlier in
1984. As individual states data became available for various years
and states, I would incorporated in to my informal study. The
number I have now in 2011 is 36 million adults have been arrested
for domestic violence. I have a gut feeling this number could be as
high as 55 million. But I only have data to 36 million. So 36
million it stays. And there is a really cool trick you can do once
you have this number. You can find out how many American men. women
and children ended up homeless because of these arrests.
Most of the domestic violence statistics I have seen break down
with 75% male and 25% female being arrested. So I am going to used
the male pronoun for the one arrested spouse and the female pronoun
for the victim spouse. That should make the domestic violence
feminists ecstatic-man bad, woman good. But that is okay because
that is probably the last nice thing I am going to do for them
today.
When then a man is arrested for domestic violence, one of two
things can happen. If they are only dating and have separate
apartments, then he can head home. But if they are living together,
then this fellow has a real problem. Bail conditions and then a
possible protective or restraining order prevent him from being
with her. So he needs to find a new place to live, at least until
the charges are resolved. The King of his Castle is no longer
allowed into his castle. A feminist name Pence who wrote that was
absolutely giddy at that outcome. So he can get his own place if he
has enough money. Or he can move in with his mother, his sister or
another relative. He might have a girl friend who would let him
stay with her. And if none of this is possible, well then I guess
he is sleeping in his car down by the river.
If he has minor children, money will soon turn into an issue.
Most men I know do not mind paying child support. They want their
kids to have food on their plates, clothes on their backs, and a
roof over their heads. But it does stress that man's finances.
Child support is usually 33% of the man's gross income. Withholding
for taxes, social security and health insurance can range up to 28%
of his gross paycheck. So a man making $500 a week gross has only
$825 monthly left over after withholding and child support. That is
not enough money for an apartment here in Central Massachusetts.
That does not include other expenses like heating, electric, gas,
groceries, telephone, cable, car payment and car insurance. So he
is in a financial hole. Estimates of homeless men run 82% to 94%. I
am going to round that down to 80%.
After the King has left his castle, his wife runs into a
problem. She was use to getting his whole paycheck for the
household. Now she get a third for child support. Figure they both
work and made the same money, her budget went from 100% down to
66%. If she was running the house on $3,045. a month when the King
was home, now without him she only has $2,220. Most households in
America cannot withstand a 27% hit on the household account. She'll
juggle the bills but eventually most wives figure out that they can
pay all the smaller bills if they just does not pay the big bill.
That would be the rent or the mortgage. So six to nine months after
the King is out of the castle, the Queen, the Princes and the
Princesses are also on the street. Domestic violence feminists
state that 50% of victim spouses of domestic violence end up
homeless at some time in their lives.
The last group of homeless from these arrests are children. The
domestic violence feminists state that 70% of domestic violence
couple have children. So 50% female times 70% children equals 35%.
But children is plural. So we will double to 70%.
(Odd isn't it? They know that 50% of victim spouses end up
homeless and that 70% of them have children. How can they know the
percentages when they do not know how many total arrests were made?
Those people at the U.S. Justice Dept. cannot even pull off a
credible cover-up. )
Men are 0.8, women are 0.5, and children are 0.7 for a grand
total of 2.0 homeless Americans for every domestic violence arrest.
Multiply that by 36 million and you get 72 million men, women and
children ending up homeless at some point in their lives over the
last 25 years because of these domestic violence arrests.
That is a really large number even by Washington standards. That
is almost 25% of the entire population of the U.S. using 2010
census figures. Which begs the question did these homeless people
contribute to this latest economic meltdown, or did they cause it?
Because if they did cause it then the recovery will not be measure
in months or years but in decades.
Some of the boys in the Father's Movement think Congress might
have shot themselves in the foot over this one. Personally, I think
they shot themselves some place anatomically higher. No wonder the
Speaker of the House is always crying. The Dummies on the
Potomac.
Twenty-five years ago the federal government start pushing these
arrests on state's legal systems. Now, we have an economy on the
rope. They have thrown a huge amount of money at banks, big
business and local and states government. And we are still in the
mud. But no economist either at the Treasury Dept., Federal
Reserve, universities or think tanks are even looking at the impact
of all these broken families. If that 36 million arrest is correct,
then 72 million men and women, have been throw out of the middle
class into subsistence living. Or is the number 55 million and 110
million? No one knows and no one is even looking. But why should
look? According to the Attorney General, we do not know how many
arrests we have made.
And if the Tea Party is any indication, insurrection is brewing
in the land. Just a coincident? Not likely. This is what happens
when the government wipes out the middle class.
The idea for these arrests came from something called the
Minneapolis Police Experiment (MPE) of 1981-82. In the experiment
police offices were given pads with one of three words written on
them; counsel, send or arrest. Counsel meant the officer was to try
to mediate the couple's spat. Send was to send one of the spouses
out of the house for eight hours as a cooling off period. Arrest
was arrest one of the two spouses. The officer was to do as the top
paper on the pad said to do. The experiment was set up by the
Police Foundation and Lawrence W. Sherman was the lead researcher.
The results show counseling resulted in a future assault in 24%
cases, send was 19%, and the arrest option resulted in a future
assault in only 10% of the cases. Perhaps a cheap way of cutting
down future domestic violence.
In 1984 The U. S. Attorney General's Task Force of Domestic
Violence recommended arrest as the primary weapon in domestic
violence assault. Lawrence W. Sherman recommend not using the
arrests because the MPE was just one study and it could be wrong.
They ignored him. And by 1992, 93% of the police departments in the
nation had adopted some form of mandatory arrest in domestic
violence cases.
But by 1992 five more addition studies similar to the MPE became
available. Lawrence W. Sherman reviewed all five studies. Then once
again he wrote that the police should not use arrest. In two of the
five studies, they found the same result as they did in the MPE,
that an arrest cut down the odds of a future assault. But in the
other three studies an arrest actually increase the odds of a
future assault. So arresting someone in a domestic violence
situation to cut down on future assaults did not work any better
than just flipping a coin. I do not know if Lawrence W. Sherman is
still alive. But fortunately he wrote a book call Policing Domestic
Violence that was published in 1992.
So we have 800,000 American police officers arresting one in
every six adults in the country and throwing 25% of the men, women
and children out on the streets in an effort to enforce a policy
that they knew did not work back in1992. And I had always assumed
that you needed a man to really screw something up. Oh well, there
goes another glass ceiling.
Why would they push an arrest policy that does not work? There
are two schools of thought on the reason why. The first comes from
Lawrence W. Sherman. He calls it the Law of Just Desserts. Revenge
for slights and offenses, real or imagined. I am sure there are
some that would argue that women are not vengeful. But what is that
old saying? Hell hath no fury.....
The second idea comes from the mother of the second wave of
feminism. I do speak of the brilliant Betty Friedan. In the
Epilogue Chapter of the 20th Anniversary Edition of her book The
Feminine Mystique, Betty relayed why she resigned as the first
president of the National Organization of Women in 1970. Betty
wrote that she, "was unable to openly fight the man haters and
unwilling to front for them any more..." So man hating bigots no
only existed 40 years ago, they were also grabbing power. Now
Washington is funding them. Makes you wonder what bigots they will
fund next. Maybe the Klan?
Feminists had always claimed that when women took over, we would
have a kinder, gentler, more nurturing world. After 36 million
arrests and 72 million evictions what we got was Joe Stalin.
The third wave of feminists do not like to call themselves
feminists. The word feminist could be perceived as gender
oppression. These third wave of whatever-we-call-you got that right
The treachery of our legal system over the last 25 years may end up
giving all feminists a bad name. Which would make us as bigoted as
the man-hating feminists who got us into this mess to begin
with.
So let us talk about those bureaucrats that do. These are the
ones that actually carry out the evil deeds. I like call them the
do-bies.
Any one swept up into legal mess is usually astonished at what
they see. They cannot believe what the police, prosecutors and
judges are doing. It is so blatantly wrong. Well, I can assure you
that everything they do is logical and by the book. The confusion
you have with them is you both are using different sets of books.
You are using the old First Set of Books- the Constitution, the
general laws or statutes and the court ruling sometime call Common
Law. They are using the newer Second Set of Books. That is the
collection of the policy, procedures and protocols. Once you know
what set of books everyone is using, then everything they do looks
logical and upright. And do not bother trying to argue with me that
there is no Second Set of Books. I have my own copies at home. Or
at least a good hunk of the important part of it.
I got my Second Set of Books when I sued the Jaffrey NH police
department. Under the discovery rule, I write them with the
material I wanted and it would arrive in the mail a few weeks
later. I got the Police Academy Training Manual. I got the
Department's Policy and Procedure Manual. I got the no-drop
protocol that the attorney general sent to all his or her
prosecutors. I even got the domestic violence protocols for the
court system, one hundred pages worth. Once you read it the
material, then you will know what the police, prosecutors and
judges will do. They are completely predictable once you know what
set of books they are using.
The police academy training manual states that an arrest in a
domestic violence call is the preferred response. They cite the
Minneapolis Police Experiment (MPE) as its justification. But the
author of the MPE, Lawrence Sherman, said do not use arrest because
five follow up studies show that it did not work. The would be a
violation of the 4th Amendment in the First Set of Books against
unreasonable search and seizure. Then there is that whole issue of
whether the police have the right to arrest for any reason other
than they believe a crime was committed.
The Jaffrey Police Department Policy and Procedures Manual
states that if a wife says she does not want her husband arrested,
the police are to ignore her, arrest the husband, and get with the
prosecutor to see what they can work out. In other words, make the
arrest and then see if you can Mickey Mouse it. The wife is
eligible for spousal immunity. If she invokes it, then no statement
she mades, written or oral, are admissible because she cannot be
cross examined about it under oath. ( Did you say that? What did
you mean when you said that?) With no statements the police have no
probable cause in most cases to make an arrest. Also a violation of
the 4th amendment in the First Set of Books.
The actor Nickolas Cage was drunk in New Orleans with his wife.
Everyone else is drunk in New Orleans, so why should Nick be any
different. He and his wife were arguing over which house the rented
for their stay. Nick grab his wife's arm and started to lead her to
his house. The police arrested Nick for domestic violence. His wife
was stunned. That was not domestic violence. "Nothing we can do,"
the police explained to her. "Just following orders."
That is an accurate explanation for victims, even if they do not
think of themselves as victims. The police have a zero tolerance
towards any physical contact. Things might get worse in the future
is the feminist logical for this present iron fist approach to
domestic relations. I would have to agree with them. After all the
arrests, poverty, homelessness and misery, I can assure you-things
are going to get worse.
But that nothing we can do, just following orders the officers
explain always sounds so timid and lame. The police need to punch
their explanation up a bit, make it more authoritarian. And there
is a quick, low cost way of doing it. The police officers only need
to say it in its original German.
The state Constitution in NH said the prosecutors job is to
promote justice. The Attorney Generals protocols said that domestic
violence case are no-drop cases. (Unless, of course, they take the
Deal. Continue the case for a year, go to counseling, and
everything falls off the books after the year. They did after all
find some way of getting rid of all these cases.)
The Attorney General can hire, fire, layoff, promote, demote,
commend or award bonuses. The constitution is some old, quaint,
dusty document up in the Statehouse some where. So which one do you
think is going to get obeyed?
Prosecutors are funny. Some, maybe most, have egos the size of
Cape Cod. But of the three, police, prosecutor and judges,
prosecutors have the least protection. Micheal Nifong, the
prosecutor in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, was fired, disbarred,
convicted of a crime, and actually jailed for trying to enforce the
no-drop prosecution protocol for sexual assault in the Duke
case.
The prosecutor in my criminal case fared a little better. I
filed a complaint with his boss for summoning my two daughters,
ages 7 and 4, to court. I had already conceded that the facts were
not in dispute. The trial would be about the law. No witness were
need much less a couple of toddlers. He still summoned them. (The
Second Set of Books tells the prosecutors to get a sympathetic face
in front of the judge or jury. What's more sympathetic than
toddlers.) The prosecutor could not refute my allegation because I
enclosed a copy of the trial transcript. I had to pay for the
transcript. When the prosecutor read it, he gave his two weeks
notice and then blew town. That transcript was the best $46 I had
ever spent in this life.
There is a name for what happens when a bureaucrat is destroyed
by the First Set of Books for attempting to enforce the Second Set
of Books. It is called the Abu Ghraib Syndrome. The people within
the law enforcement community no longer seem to know the difference
between the law, with its checks and balances, and the policies,
procedure and protocols that constitute The Second Set of Books. In
some cases you do not even know who wrote the policy, procedure or
protocol. It could have been the local high school gym teacher for
all anyone knows. Many of these bureaucrats are eventually going to
learn the different between the First and the Second Set of Books.
And my guess is that many of them are going to learn it the hard
way. Because the only checks and balances in The Second Set of
Books is The First Set of Books.
Judges routinely use our children as bargaining chips. Get the
adult into counseling, continue the case for a year, and then drop
it. This will open up the docket for the new arrests coming in next
week. These judges that use our children are not honorable. Which
is why I never use the term 'Your Honor' any more. I just call them
judge.
Alex Baldwin, the actor, wrote that you have never seen a coward
until you have seen a Los Angeles County judge. I call my
judges-Sullivan, Arnold and even Runyon-cowards, too. When I first
started observing them, nothing made sense. Arnold was completely
infuriated when he was maneuvered into ruling not guilty. He
verbally went up and down me so many times I lost count. What was
the big deal? If I was not guilty just say and then we could all go
home. But that was back in the days before I knew about The Second
Set of Books.
I lost visitation with my two daughters when I got arrested. One
was the victim-the other was the witness. After a not guilty, I
expected to get visitation with my girls. But the divorce judge,
Sullivan, decreed that counseling was in order and they would
decide when we would reunite. I told the judge that the decision on
whether these two girls had a father or a fatherless childhood was
not leaving this courthouse. There would be a couple of reason for
that decision.
First, by then I knew of the Second Set of Books. As much as I
had prayed for the return of my children, I knew that this
counseling might get thrown in the way. Judges are addicted to
counseling like a meth-head is addict to crystal meth. Sullivan
wrote in the divorce decree that he envision only one or two
meetings with the counselor. There is no counseling done in the
first meeting or two. It is intake-who's the players and what are
the issues. But Sullivan was not interested in counseling. He
merely wanted to unload the decision out of habit. And if we do not
shut them down now, they will be doing it to our kids in twenty
years from now when they have little ones running around the
house.
Second, just exactly where does the buck stop with our legal
system? Police have to make an arrest. The prosecutor has to pursue
the case. Judges now also walk a away without rendering a verdict,
and passing the buck does not constitute a decision. Can those
mental health counselors slide the decision over to someone else?
Just where does this end? Who is responsible? Who is
accountable?
The mental health crowd is the third reason I said no. Some
people think they are geniuses with their Masters and PH D's.
Others think they are so wacky that they call them fruit loops.
Well, I have a third name for them. Suckers. They did not get hired
for their medical ability. They got these because they were willing
to take these cases off the judge's hands. Which has done nothing
for the credibility for their profession. We are not here to
help-we are here to unload. And they created a liability that did
not previously existed. If a judge releases a defendant and he goes
kills someone, that judge or the judiciary cannot be sued. But a
mental health worker, and their employer certainly can be held
liable. Our judiciary is now using the mental health field like a
ten dollar whore.
I sued Monadnock Family Services to make them go away. I told
their lawyer Byron that they were a legitimate target for men. We
settled for no money. They would have nothing to do with this
reconciliation. The counselor was released. And they would no
longer get involved in any domestic violence cases.
Every time we ended back in court over whatever squabbles, I
would ask Judge Sullivan for my children back. The decision belong
to the counselors he would tell me. But he knew he had screwed up.
I could see it in his face. But he would not fix it. He would not
step out of that box those domestic violence/sexual assault
advocates had built for him. After five years, he retired to a part
time position at the Littleton courthouse 120 miles away.
So when guys like Alex Baldwin and I call judges cowards, we
have legitimate reasons for doing so. It is not good for judges to
be called coward. It is unlikely that it is good for the rest of
us.
I do not claim to have all The Second Set of Book. I know of one
book that I do not have. And I would have love to read that one.
That would be the seminar that the domestic violence and sexual
assault advocates put on periodically for legal personnel including
judges. These advocates are camped outside every state, not
federal, courthouse in America. The U.S. Dept of Justice provides
50-100% of their funding depending on the program. They have three
day seminars at resorts where everything is paid for except the
liquor. Judges in NH are ordered to attend. Neither Sullivan or
Arnold would confirm or deny they had attended. They actually said
nothing. It must be like the Masons where they will not say
anything about the organization until you show them the secret hand
sign.
Supreme Court Judge Louis Brandeis once wrote that the best
description of a judge is the impartial guardian of the rule of
law. How does three days of wine, women and song contribute to
impartiality? It does not. So it should not have been any surprise
that they would not answer me. After all, they were not on trial. I
was. But they are going to be. They were suppose to protect to rule
of law not collaborate in its demise. They have failed
miserably.
A guardian ad litem is an attorney appointed for a child. The
attorney solely represents the child. I got one when I was first
separated to get a neutral pair of eyes and ears on the family. I
was disappointed in his findings.
A few years later, another guardian was appointed for one of the
kids. A regular report filed with the Court painted me as some sort
violent psychopath. I thought that was uncalled for seeing as we
had never met. It start a flurry of nasty letters between until we
both came to the conclusion that this was not about us. We ended on
a friendly note.
At a Court hearing later on I approached him. I asked him if he
had had any domestic violence training. He said yes, that it was
required to become certified as a guardian ad litem. Another
chapter for The Second Set of Books that I never managed to
acquire.. So men, if you were thinking about getting a guardian ad
litem for an unbiased assessment, then you should ask for the
domestic violence material that certified the guardian. And do not
worry that you are not sure what you are looking for. It will stand
right out.
There are more sections of The Second Set of Books. Medical
personnel are supposed to report suspected domestic violence. The
college professor Angela Davis has a story of a Latino couple in
California getting in trouble feeding the dog his liver for dinner.
Mental health employees are also required. Think of Wendy
threatening our kids with foster care. Teachers, day care
providers, the list just goes on and on. The East German secret
police, the Stazi, had 25% of the population on record as
informers. The United States is not that high yet, but we are still
growing.
These people-police, prosecutors and judges-are suppose to
protect us. They are checks and balances to prevent injustice. That
is why we spend so much money of police training. But if the police
screw it up, the prosecutor can catch it. If the prosecutor misses
it then the judge can step in to fix it. But if all three have been
compromised, then what does one need to do to get justice? Go to
the appeals court or the Supreme Court? That seem a little
ridiculous particularly when the zero tolerance has arrests for
something as trivial as touching.
On one hand we have the law. On the other hand we have what we
are really going to do-the policies, procedures and protocols. The
rule of law is dead. Now we have 50 states with legal systems as
good as any third world banana republic. Men are demonized and the
women and children end up as suffering as well.
So boys, we need to start burning down police stations and
courthouses. The Second Set of Books originated in Washington. But
the dirty deeds are being carried out by our local police,
prosecutors and judges. These are the people we pay good money to
protect us and our families. And what do we get for our tax money?
Collaborators who are no different than the Vichy of France or the
Quislings of Norway during the Second World War. All because they
go along to get along. They are an embarrassment, the whole lot of
them. And they need to be held accountable. So burn them out.
In the last 25 years they have arrested one in six adults in
this country and forced 25% of the men, women and children into
homelessness. In 50 years it will be one in three adults arrested
and 50% of the men, women and children ending up homeless. Most of
our kids will live to the age of 68 years old. As bad as it was for
you, your children will have twice the odds of it happening to
them.
Some of you will say that 50% homelessness sounds absurd. But
25% is absurd and that is already here. There is no evidence that
the police, courts, or government is planning to do anything
different in the immediate future. And they will not do anything
different until we make it so uncomfortable that they must change.
Bureaucracy at its worst. So burn them out. This is too important
to be using that touchy-feeling coaching that is so popular with
business these days. You need to flatten them, like Wile E. Coyote.
They need to be taught never to replace the rule of law.
BURN-THEM-OUT!
Most of the police stations built in New England over the last
20 years are stone or brick. Fortunately, the roofs are still wood.
The advantage of fire on the roof is that it is above the
sprinklers. But even the sprinklers going off work to our
advantage. There is no way they can work in a building with six
inches of water. And I am certain we will disrupt their momentum
once they start working out of a FEMA trailers. If they still do
not get the message, then burn down the trailers.
The easiest way of burning a building is with the Molotov
cocktail. It was invented by the Finns when the Soviets invaded in
1939. You fill a bottle with gasoline and stuff a rag in the end
for a wick. You light the wick and throw bottle, It shatters on
impact spraying gas everywhere and the wick ignites the gas.
Simple, readily available, and effective. And only two things to
remember.
First, use a glass bottle. Thinner glass is better than thicker
glass. You want it to shatter on impact. When I was teaching a kid
at the high school on the West Side Worcester, MA. threw a Molotov
cocktail into his school. Fortunately, he used a plastic bottle. It
burned about three square inches of carpeting. I had to laugh when
I said to myself, "Thank God for dumb kids."
Second, you need to tie the rag to the bottle. Nothing worse
that throwing a Molotov cocktail, landing where you wanted it, and
having it shatter perfectly. Then you noticed the wick had fallen
out on the way to the target. No wick-no fire.
Some of these building will have brick faces and metal roofs.
Just break a window and throw the Molotov cocktail inside. Carpets,
furniture, computer plastic, even paint on the walls will burn. It
is okay if the sprinkler goes off. I wonder if you can get hip
waders over a gun belt?
We had a kid in my hometown that burned down the old junior high
school. He walked up to the front door one night with a can of
lighter fluid. The applicator on the end squirts the lighter fluid
out. He squirted under the door and along the seams and lit a
match. The kid took out the entire old part of the building. Why
are kids so competent when it is something they should not be
doing?
There will be some casualties in this war. Some killed, some
wounded, some captured. Some of them will be theirs. Some of the
casualties will be ours.
Now, nobody wants to get killed. But let us look at your life.
You are broke after paying child support. She and the kids are not
doing any better. None of you are middle class any more. You have
no say in the kids education, their health treatment, you may not
even have visitation with your sons and daughters. And everything
you thought you knew to be true-the rule of law, the sanctity of
the of the family, the belief that government was there to nurture
your brood-all turned out to be a lie. Face it boys, we are no
longer fathers. We are just piggy banks.
So you are not losing anything by picking up the Molotov
cocktail. It may be too late for us. But without something
changing, your kids will have double the odds of it happening to
them. That will knock them out of the middle class again, providing
they ever get back in. And their kids, your grandchildren, will end
up damaged goods before it is over. So it is okay to run. You just
need to turn around and run at them. They are no way as imposing as
they seem. They only do what they do for a paycheck.
Television would make us believe that people get arrested
because of fingerprints, DNA, facial recognition, and instruments
that can tell where a substance was made and here is the local
distributors. It is Hollywood crap. Most of the people in prison
are there for one key reason. They could not keep their mouths
shut. They told someone. That someone told others. The cops hear it
and start looking at them for a suspect. That how it works in real
life.
This need to confess seems to be primeval. Just human nature.
But if you cannot keep a secret, do not expect the one you tell to
keep their mouth shut. There is only three people I know for
certain they will keep their mouths shut. That would be Jesus, Mary
and Joseph.
I only managed to get the main door of the Cheshire County
Courthouse in Keene, NH. I would appreciate it if some of you boys
would finish the job for me. They harmed my children. The place is
evil. So take it out
Some where along the line I picked up the crazy notion that it
is better to be dead as a free man than to live as a serf. The
government needs to be a little more careful about what they teach
in our schools.
And bring a can of spray paint to these fires. Paint the word
COLLABORATORS ( two L's with an S on the end) on the building
before you burn it. Maybe we can shame them back to the rule of
law. And we do want the police to know exactly who burned the
building. Then the police can start interviewing the usually
suspects, all 36 million of us.
We have covered the do-bies. Now let us look at the bureaucrats
that say-ers.
The Second Set of Books originated in Office of Violence Against
Women (OVW) which is part of the United States Department of
Justice. Some of these policies, procedures and protocol were
developed locally. But the local results would be sent up to OVW
and, if approved, would disperse it out to all 50 states. They are
smart, clever, bigoted and able to lie as well as any politician
that ever called Washington home. In other words, they have now
become Washington insiders.
But what makes them so uniques is their anger towards men, any
man. They are so twisted in their hatred of men that they are
positively scary. And it is not what they are doing to men that
makes them frightening. You would expect that. No, it is what they
are doing to the women and children that makes them so twisted.
When the Pentagon drops a bomb on innocent civilians the
military calls it Collateral Damage. It sounds better than, "Yeah,
we killed a bunch of women and children." Those poor, innocent,
stupid civilians have always been caught in the middle since the
time we were fighting with rocks.. Your wife and kids are
Collateral Damage in the war against you, the man in the family.
For 25 years these feminists at OVAW have been willing to sacrifice
the women and children to get you. And they cannot claim ignorance
about what they are doing. Under the VAWA the federal government is
funding at least 1,800 homeless shelters. As long as the Office for
Violence Against Women exists in the U.S. Department Justice , no
American man, women or child will be safe in their own home.
If you ask these feminists why are the shelters all full, they
will not say because of all the arrests. The shelters are full
because of men. But they knew from the beginning that this was not
man bad-woman good thing. The year was 1976. Two things would
happen that year.
First, someone at the U.S. Dept of Justice decided to count the
dead bodies. In 1975 there were 1522 women killed in domestic
violence. And for men killed in 1975? The dead for men was 1506.
Statistically equal a friend tells me so.
If you had asked me before the study, I would have assumed that
women were getting the worst of it. But I would be looking at it by
genders. What I should have been looking at was species,
homo-sapiens, human beings. Men are human-women are human. Being
the same species you would expect the same results from both
genders. And that is exactly what the dead bodies told us.
The second thing that happened in 1976 was the first domestic
violence survey was released. It was so new the time that they
called it family violence. Murray Straus of UNH and Richard Gellars
from a school in RI were the researchers. They did not find two
perpetrators of domestic violence, but three. Men initiated
violence 25.7% of the time: women 25.2%, and the other 49.1% was
the two going after each at the same time. These two people going
after each other at the same time is well recognized in law. The
law in NH calls that mutual combat. Men are human. Women are human.
And once again we found both genders acting the same manner.
So how did we end up with the theory of man bad-woman good that
the government at all levels is using? The feminist writer Susan
Brownmiller wrote In Our Time that," the way you get funding and
church donations is to talk about the pure victims. If you talk
about the impurity of the victim, the sympathy vanishes." If women
get to be good then men get what is left-bad. Man bad-woman good
was originally a funding raising technique. After 35 years, it has
turned into official government dogma at all levels, from the local
cop on the beat to the White House. Men need to be punished,
restrained and retrained. Your wives and children are,
unfortunately, just collateral damage in this effort to punish men.
So you were not dreaming it. There really is a government pogrom
against men.
When a man batters or kills, there is no excuse. When a woman
commits the same act, there is nothing but excuses. Simple though
inaccurate. But there is one redeeming aspect to men being
demonized. Now we men can act like devils. And we do not even need
to apologize for it. Men are going to start acting just like they
made us out to be. As an old high school semi-punk I can assure you
boys of one thing. This is going to be fun. You guys are going to
end up laughing like hyenas.
The money funded under the VAWA is split in two when it leaves
the Treasury. Part goes the Health and Human Services for fund
these domestic violence homeless shelters. If that 36 million
number is correct, and it is all that we have, then the 1.44
million arrests a year will be made producing 2.88 million homeless
Americans each year. Women and children constitute 60% of these
homeless people, 1.7 million Americans a year. Shutting down these
shelters would be cruel. What would these women and children do
then? Go live under a bridge. No, we are stuck with these shelters
for a while. But there is one thing that Congress needs to fix when
they fund them again.
These shelters do not allow men on the property let alone inside
the residences. Why is it against the law to use federal money on
organizations that discriminate against black, Jews, gays or even
women but it is okay to do so against men? Men contributed half
that tax money. Eight years ago a man in California fled with his
children after the police warned him to get out after they had
arrested the wife and mother. None of the shelters would take him
and the kids in because he was a man. I wonder if this would
survive a legal gender discrimination challenge in a federal
court?
A society without men is freakier than a world without blacks or
Jews. That is not to say blacks or Jews are any less worthy. It
just that there are more men in the world than blacks or Jews even
if you combined them. If these feminist had to deal with men on a
regular basis, then maybe the country would not be in the pickle we
are in now.
There is a third reason to end this discrimination, something of
a more practical nature. Apparently, some women like to have sex
with men. But men are barred from the property. Suddenly, that 15
year boy two doors down starts looking real good. It might even be
fun breaking in this new meat. So this woman driven into insolvency
by the push for domestic violence arrests now finds herself charged
as a pedophile because someone barred men from her world. With
domestic violence advocates as friends, who needs enemies.
This shelters came up with a novel approach to fixing the
pedophile problem. Male children over the age of thirteen are
barred from staying there. Too troublesome. The family broke up
when the father was thrown out of the house. Now a second break up
is happening with the teenage boys. Perhaps a relative has one bed
available. Maybe the family of a high school friend would take him
in their home. If neither option works then that is okay. He can
move in with his father. Then they will both be sleeping in the car
down by the river.
Children of these parents also suffer. They used to have their
own bedroom in a safe town with good schools. First they have a
shelter, then Section 8 public housing. An urban school. Maybe
good-maybe not. Kids learn how to be tough in an urban environment.
The kids might go bad or they could come out just fine. But there
will be no clunky car as a teenager. There will be no saving fund
for college. There will be no monetary gift to use as a down
payment for a starter home. This tradition of the older generation
giving the younger generation a financial leg up has been ruin due
to the older generation's lack of money. Financially, the older
generation is merely treading water. It will take generations after
these present two generations to repair the economic damage to
these families.
So we are stuck with funding these shelters for a while. These
women and children have no place left to go. Some of you guys may
think that these feminist caused the problem and then created the
solution. But homeless shelters are not a solution. They are just
barely a band aid.
The remaining money under VAWA goes to the United States
Department of Justice for the Office of Violence Against Women
(OVW). As long as OVW exists then the government is at war with
men. As long as there is a pogrom against men, then women and
children are going to end up as collateral damage. So there is no
need for discussion about OVW going. The only thing we need to
figure out is which of the two ways we can use to get rid of
them-the easy way or the hard way.
And boys, do not try to burn down Washington's Dept. of Justice
Building in an effort to get rid of the Office of Violence Against
Women. Their offices are over at N Street.
The easy way is using Congress. The VAWA comes up for funding
every five to seven years. Next time it comes up, Congress votes no
and everyone at the OVW gets a pink slip in late September. Nice
and simple except nothing is simple in Washington. We, the people
out here in the sticks, do not always know what the dynamics are in
Washington. There might be one method of getting Congress on
course. Have Congress demand that the Attorney General get, and
release the arrests figures. Or have the President order it. He is
usually fearless after he makes up his mind. And this is too large
and too well known to continue the Washington plausible deniable
routine. Then they will know how much trouble they are in because
of these arrests.
There are 220 million adults 18 or older in this country of both
sexes. If my figure of 36 million is correct, then that is 16.4% of
the adults have been arrested. It could be as high as 55 million or
25%. It might be as low as 22 million or 10%. Whatever the number
there are two things that Congress should know. First, is the
fellow who discovered the arrests in Minneapolis back in 1992 said
do not use it because it does not work. And second, the people
arrested now constitute a Fifth Column here in the United States.
Our loyalty to Washington is gone. But what did these genuises on
the Potomac expect? They have harmed our children. If they think Al
Qaeda is a pain in the ass, wait to they see what Americans can do
once their fuse is lit.
I am certain the Attorney General will sit for months on the
request for the number of domestic violence arrests. Then he will
explain that they do not readily have the number and that some sort
of Manhattan Project effort will be needed in time and money.
Nonsense. When Washington started these arrests in 1984 over 6.3
personal computers were sold here in the U.S. That figure does not
include all the mini's, midi's and mainframe computers sold that
year. There is no way they can pretend that this data does not
exist in electronic storage. A request to Ohio for the arrests
1984-2010 would tie up a state clerk for an hour, including their
15 minute coffee break. Time for the truth boys and girls. Because
this is not going away.
The hard way is more time consuming, cost more money and is full
of headaches. Because the only way of removing a department from
the federal government without the consent of Congress is to take
out the entire federal government.
The first time I heard that, I said that is ridiculous. We
cannot run this country without a federal government. But we will
replace the old government with something new and improved. The new
government would honor the debts incurred by the old government.
There are a lot of useful reasons for starting with a clean
slate.
The bipartisan debt commission released their recommendation for
cleaning up the $14 trillion we have borrowed over the years.
Convention wisdom has it that Congress has no stomach for any of
the recommendations.
But a new government could install those recommendation on day
one. Three years later, most Americans will not remember that
anything is different. The old government laid off its employees
when it closed. The new government is hiring. But instead of 65,000
employees at the Dept. of Education, the new government is only
hiring 45,000. Instead of an average federal wage of $70,000 a
year, the new average will be $52,000. The new government will have
to write a tax code. Everyone pays 15% with no deductions. How many
IRS employees could you get rid of if there were no more
deductions? Any thing is possible with a new government.
Normally over-throwing a elected government is considered
treason. Treason is punishable by death here in the United States.
But there is one way of over throwing the government. That is
through the ballot box. Then it is not treason but democracy.
Allegedly, Washington is in favor of democracy, particularly if
their candidate wins.
There is no legal mechanism in the Constitution or the Federal
code of the United States for dissolving the government of the
United States. So that is what we need first. Congress would need
to write it. We get them to do it through the ballot
initiative.
A ballot initiative is when enough registered voters sign a
petition to get a question on the ballot for the next election. The
following would be a sample of what the question would look like in
New Hampshire.
That all elected representatives from the state of New Hampshire
to both houses of the United States Congress are to propose and
advance a bill that would set up a legal mechanism to dissolve the
United States government should the people decide to do so in a
general election by a simple majority.
If this initiative passes in all 50 states then Congress will be
stuck. They will have to write the law to dissolve. If they do not
I suspect within ten years they will be standing in a stairwell at
the British or French embassy with a suitcase in hand waiting to
get to a rooftop helicopter. I doubt if they will be thinking about
the humiliation of being thrown out of the country. They will be
far too busy worrying about what will happen if the mob gets their
hands on them.
Washington has not got a friend in the world. Even the British
and Israelis loath them now. Kind of a bad time to be losing
domestic support. And what they done over the last 25 years? They
have wiped out the middle class pandering to a special interest
group of bigots. And in typical Washington fashion, they did not
even know they did it.
This Ivy League inbreeding in Washington has produced an elite
that knows what best. Everyone else-husbands, wives, police
officers, prosecutors, judges, attorney generals and guardian ad
litems-are to shut up and do what they are told. The rule of law is
gone, replaced by the policies, procedures and protocols of The
Second Set of Books. Which means the federal government will be
going shortly. For the government being unable to deliver the rule
of law is like an auto mechanic who claims he does not know how to
change the engine oil. A certain minimum competency is required. So
it looks like the parents of the Washington elite were right. One
can be too smart for their own good.
Betty Friedan wrote that the feminist revolution, like any
revolution, would have its excesses. Losing the rule of law is too
great to call it a mere excess. It is a catastrophe. It is the
heart, mind and soul between the people and their government. These
feelings of betrayal by losing it may be permanent. I have 21 years
of Army service going back to the Vietnam War. My loyalty to the
government should be a given. It is gone. I am certain it will
never return regardless of how long I might have lived.
It was another woman that lead us in to this decision to clean
house inside the beltway. Something she taught us fifty years ago.
You simply look at those folks in Washington and then ask yourself
the old Ann Landers question, "Am I better off with them, or
without them? Are my children better off with them, or without
them?" They are sinking like stones.
Washington, DC was chose as the capital because it was the
geographical center or the old Colonies. Today, the geographical
center of the country is just west of St. Louis Missouri. The new
government can set the capital anywhere in the United States it
wants. Imagine how many rodents, insects and parasites they could
lose by moving 1500 miles west.
Whether you replace the federal government or not, men are still
going to need a legal defense center for men. Something like the
NAACP used to get black people their rights. The only checks and
balances in the Second Set of Books is the First Set of Books.
Which means lawsuits. Now I know you guys are broke. Some of you
have had your wives and kids thrown into homelessness. So I
completely understand when you tell me that you are broke. But if
everyone who has been arrested throws in $10.00 a year then the
legal defense center will have a war chest of $360 million. You can
buy a whole bunch of lawsuit with that kind of money.
The Ball family has been supplying sergeants to the Army since
at least the Revolutionary War. Elijah served as a sergeant in
Cushing's Regiment at the Battle of Bennington. His commanding
officer was a general from NH with a name of John Stark. General
Start was a clever warrior. He was responsible for the bulk of the
heavy casualties the British suffer at their victory at Bunker
Hill. His orderly, fighting withdrawal allowed the other units on
the hill to not only retreat but collect their wounded on the way
out.
General Stark would repeat this performance on three hill tops
outside the village of Bennington VT one hot August day in 1777. At
the end of the battle, the British lost over 900 men killed or
captured. The Colonists suffered 30 dead. Two months later, the
depleted British army would surrender at Saratoga. That victory at
Saratoga would bring the French into the war. John Stark was the
most competent general this country ever produced. For that reason
alone his men loved him.
But as brilliant as he was on the battlefield, General Stark
would become even more famous for something he said. In 1809 the
veterans of Bennington decided to have one last reunion. A
delegation called on the General with his invitation. But the
General was old and frail. He could not attend. But he did send a
message, "You tell the boys I said live free or die. That death is
not the worst of evil." Since 1945 the State of New Hampshire has
stamped Live Free or Die on every pen, coffee mug, license plate
and highway sign that they have gotten their hands on.
I think the General and his sergeant would be please that his
words have elevated from the novelties and bric-a-brac to something
more dignified like a courthouse door. Neither of them would give a
second thought to the mess left over after the fire was
extinguished. War has always been a grim business. Civil wars are
usually worse.
But they would be trouble by the new enemy. Oh, they understood
when a government betrays it people. They took up arms against the
super power of their day to get relief for their grievances. But
the enemy we face now is the government that these men birthed at
places like Bennington, Saratoga and Bunker Hill. Government is no
different than the food in a refrigerator. Given enough time both
will go bad.
The smartest person I knew in this life was my mother. Perhaps
that is true of all of us. Maybe I just got lucky. She was a nurse
by trade. She worked in a time when Western medicine made that
final transition from butchery to science. But it would not be her
nursing skills that made her extraordinary. No, it would be this
one incredible knack she had that I had only modest success at
mimicking in my life. If she had something important to say to you,
she would say and then never mention it again. She would talk about
it if you raised the issue. But she never mentioned it twice on her
own. And, oddly, you always heard her.
But she did have one favorite saying. I must have heard in a
thousand times in the eighteen years I lived under her roof. It
always came at the end of the conversation as she peeled away to
see if it was time for Perry Mason or Lawrence Welk. She would turn
her head to the side, and over her shoulder she would say, "And the
only thing you really have in this world is your family." Now,
thanks to the United States Government, neither we nor our children
have that.
. I have three things to say to my children. First, Daddy loves
you. Second, you are my three most favorite people in the world.
And last, that you are to stick together no matter how old you get
or how far apart you live. Because it is like Grandma always said.
The only thing you really have in this world is your family.
No comments:
Post a Comment