Posts
Social Security – The International Mark Of The Beast
11 Votes
-≈-
The Global Social Security System
-≈-
Did you know that over 130 countries in the world now have a Social Security Insurance program?
Did you know that Social Security is run and regulated by the United Nations and its World Bank?
Have you ever heard of the International Social Security Association (ISSA)?
And did you know that the United States
Social Security Administration has international treaties and agreements
through the United Nations with other countries and their Social
Security Systems?
Well, its all true… But before we get into
that, let’s make sure we understand just what this Social program really
means, being a United States Citizen with a Social Security Number.
It is so much more than you might think…
-≈-
Social Security – The Mark of the Beast
-≈-
The MARK of the BEAST is upon all American Citizens!!! And the Federal Corporation named the “UNITED STATES” is that BEAST!And the MARK of the BEAST is the NUMBER…
-≈-
One of the greatest misconceptions of biblical prophesy is that the thing
referenced in the Bible as the “Antichrist”, and in so many other
fictional tales of said Antichrist, will some day be incarnated as a
single living entity – a beast in the guise of a human – that will fool
the people of Earth into loving and following that beast into a virtual
hell and enslavement on Earth.But I am here to provide you with an alternative and more realistic view. I am here to say that the biblical “Antichrist” is already upon us. It is not a single person; but a government run by and consented to by the people. It is not a living, breathing human or demon, but is instead all humans via their consent to it. It is not the devil reincarnate; but is in fact an incarnate body of legal codes that has created the Mark of the Beast through the people’s ignorance of the laws that they create. And I am here to say that it is not God that will save us from this Antichrist; but only our collective non-consent through non-participation in this system that will save us from ourselves.
If it is true that God gave men the gift and the curse of having freewill, then it must also be true that God only helps those who helps themselves…
-≈-
What is the Mark of the Beast?
-≈-
In TITLE 42 of U.S. CODE, entitled “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE”,
we can literally find the root of this evil MARK from the BEAST called SOCIAL SECURITY.
Though TITLE 42 is not statutory law, but in actuality prima facie law
(consent of the governed required), the implementation of that legal
code is exactly what we’d expect from the beast as the Federal UNITED
STATES corporation.So let’s have a look at Section 666 of U.S.C. TITLE 42 “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLFARE”.
Section 666 of the Social Security Act requires every state (as federal insular possessions) to obtain a persons “NUMBER” that is attached to the “NAME” of that person before such things as a license to work, drive, marry, or any other State services (privileges – not rights) are granted; of which now include Federal grants and emoluments to the states as “revenue sharing” for promotion of this enslavement via the NUMBER. In other words, a natural born citizen of the united states of America cannot work in the Federal UNITED STATES jurisdictional territory (“The Federal United States”) without being marked by the Social Security number – the number of the beast.
For those of you that don’t understand the difference between these two governments and that as citizens you are required to obey both, please read what the Supreme Court’s opinion of this fact is here:
“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments:
one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict
between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not.
They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions.
Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United
States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their
rights (privileges) at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has VOLUNTARILY submitted himself to such a form of government.“ –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”
“And behold, I swear unto you, if ye
will do this, with an oath, ye shall not be destroyed; but if ye will
not do this, I swear unto you with an oath, that on the morrow month I
will command that my armies shall come down against you, and they shall
not stay their hand and shall spare not, but shall slay you, and shall
let fall the sword upon you even until ye shall become extinct.” –Nephi 3:8
While I can choose to not consent to the mark (the social security
number), the BEAST has made it virtually impossible to work, drive,
spend money, or live legally without this number within the corporate
world of the jurisdiction of the BEAST. And as a corporation of any kind
(including that of being a person with a NUMBER), that
business must comply with now established state and federal laws to
continue to legally do incorporated business in the state, which is
within the federal district of The Federal United States (A.K.A. The
BEAST). In short, the ability to not consent to this MARK is nullified
by the BEAST through the legal code that makes those without the NUMBER
unable to support themselves or work without the MARK.Section 666 of TITLE 42 clearly lays out this authority and jurisdiction. Though the majority of this CODE is referring to paternal suits of child support, it is important to understand that this power can be applied to anyone through such tools as due process and other abusive authorities. To understand the true significance of Section 666, one must understand that through the due process of the BAR Association in the court system, it is the opinion of all courts – municipal or federal (district) – that you do not own your children alone, and that your children are literally owned by the BEAST (the State).
So that there is no doubt of this being true, please review my previous article here:
Do You Own Your Children? –> http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/
Excerpt from this article:
Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108:
“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.“
Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
Continued…
“…When two people decide to get
married, they are required to first procure a license from the State. If
they have children of this marriage, they are required by the State to
submit their children to certain things, such as school attendance and
vaccinations. Furthermore, if at some time in the future the couple
decides the marriage is not working, they must petition the State for a
divorce. Marriage is a three-party contract between the man, the woman,
and the State“
Linneman v. Linneman, 1 Ill. App.
2d 48, 50, 116 N.E.2d 182, 183 (1953), citing Van Koten v. Van Koten,
323 Ill. 323, 326, 154 N.E. 146 (1926).
“The State represents the public interest in the institution of marriage.”
Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d at 50, 116 N.E.2d at 183 (1953).
Continued…
“This public interest is what allows
the State to intervene in certain situations to protect the interests of
members of the family. The State is like a silent partner in the
family who is not active in the everyday running of the family but
becomes active and exercises its power and authority only when necessary
to protect some important interest of family life.”
“The state has a wide range of power
for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the
child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the
State.”
Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.
“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
“There is no wider area for the
exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and
protecting the best interests of children.“
Ex parte Handley, 460 So.2d 167 (Ala.1984).
“The court stands in the position of parens patria[e] of children.“
Ayers v. Kelley, 284 Ala. 321, 224 So.2d 673 (1969)․
“Parens patriae,” literally “parent
of the country,” refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and
guardian of persons under legal disability.”
Ex parte Bayliss, 550 So.2d 986, 988 n. 1 (Ala.1989) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1003 (5th ed.1979)).
“Pursuant to the parens patriae doctrine, ‘the primary control and custody of infants is with the government, to be delegated, as of course, to their natural guardians and protectors, so long as such guardians are suitable persons to exercise it.’ ”
Ex parte Wright, 225 Ala. 220,
222, 142 So. 672, 674 (1932). See also Fletcher v. Preston, 226 Ala.
665, 148 So. 137 (1933); and Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. 87 (1860).
“In other words, the state is the
father and mother of the child and the natural parents are not entitled
to custody, except upon the state’s beneficent recognition that natural
parents presumably will be the best of its citizens to delegate its
custodial powers… ‘The law devolves the custody of infant children upon
their parents, not so much upon the ground of natural right in the
latter, as because the interests of the children, and the good of the
public, will, as a general rule, be thereby promoted.’ “
Chandler v. Whatley, 238 Ala. 206, 208, 189 So. 751, 753 (1939) (quoting Striplin v. Ware, 36 Ala. at 89) (‘ ’).
And now that we understand that you are only the delegated third
party guardian of State “property” instead of what you thought were your
children, we can examine in full Section 666 with the understanding
that through marriage contract and the NUMBER as a MARK on all persons –
including children – the BEAST has complete control over you and your
children and their well-being because they are indeed MARKED with the
NUMBER. And the BEAST also has the self-delegated authority to force a
person to be guardian of that child through monetary payments – even if
that person is never allowed to see that child again. Similar to being
put on probation, this judgment for “child support” is used not
for the benefit of the child, but for the benefit of the BEAST to
contol that person and to justify the stripping of that persons rights
(privileges) if he or she does not comply.Forcing parents to fill out a birth certificate and register their child in the Civil Service and Social Security system is paramount for this claimed legal ownership by the BEAST through due process to have jurisdiction and authority.
Now, let’s read TITLE 42, Section 666…REST HERE: http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/social-security-the-international-mark-of-the-beast/
No comments:
Post a Comment