Nobody else is going to save you but yourself-but how?
Read on.
I hold no copyright to any articles, save that:
1)You reproduce in entirety
2)Link to freedomguide.blogspot.com
3)Accredit authorship to J. Croft
First some words for westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com:
To everyone else: be smart about this. Not saying no, not saying
yes but Dyer made his choice and if you’re going to support him in the
way I’m thinking you are as I type this…. realize that ANY out of state
characters appearing in Oklahoma or Texas are going to be INSTANTLY
pegged and probably approached. They have many tricks to catch you off
your guard.
Imagine just how closely they’re scrutinizing the Oklahoma and Texas
militias right now… the eye of Mordor is burning a hole through em!
So, don’t look like militia, don’t be seen in a vehicle with out of
state plates-especially yours. Attempts to directly contact Dyer will
be used to home in on you both. Be aware of that.
Also be aware that they’re crazy focused on Dyer and containing this situation to their advantage. Use that to your advantage.
quote: Originally posted by Texas Resistance: “I do not know why she would have been removed from the BOLO,” District Attorney Jason Hicks said Monday.
In a perfect world, the FBI and DA Jason Hicks would be as confused about this case as I am.
quote: Originally posted by Texas Resistance:
With the Sept. 11 anniversary nearing, Swan believes Dyer is also
being set up. Known for his skull face half-mask worn in many videos,
Dyer has given “the machine” a perfect foil, Swan said. “What a
beautiful setup; what a great strawman they get to set up,” Swan said.
“I believe this guy is going to be blamed for something big.”
Yep.
Onward and upward, airforce
Posts: 8155 | From: Tulsa | Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 08-23-2011 03:20 PM
Oathkeepers steps up to the plate...
quote: Oath Keepers Offers to Assist in Peaceful Resolution of Charles Dyer Situation
As
you may know, Charles Dyer, known as "July4patriot" on Youtube, is now
the subject of an FBI manhunt after failing to appear for trial in
Oklahoma. News reports came in that he may be in the Sealy, Texas area,
and now there are news reports stating that Charles Dyer may be in the
area of Fort Bend County, Texas. Jay Stang, our Texas Vice President,
lives in Sugar Land, which is in Fort Bend County.
Jay
met Charles Dyer at the Oath Keepers rally on Lexington Green, April 19,
2009, and they became friends. They also happened to serve in the same
unit in the Marine Corps, though not at the same time. Because
Charles Dyer may be in the Houston Texas area, Jay Stang has offered to
serve as a go-between to help Charles surrender peacefully, so he can go
to trial.
After coordinating with Oath Keepers national
President, Stewart Rhodes and with Texas Chapter President, John Shirley
( a current serving Houston PD sergeant), Jay contacted Dyer's
attorney, who agreed with the idea, and then contacted the FBI Houston
Field Office to let the FBI know that Jay is willing to serve in that
capacity, as a go-between.
We don't want to see anyone
get hurt - either Charles or peace officers. We think the very safest
way for Charles to turn himself in would be to go to a local police
department, take off his shirt or even strip down to his skivvies, walk
in and turn himself over to the desk sergeant, who is less likely to be
amped up and on the trigger when compared to officers involved in the
manhunt.
But if Charles Dyer contacts Jay, or if Jay is
contacted by law enforcement, he is willing to help bring Charles Dyer
in peacefully, whatever the circumstances.
Here is a message from Jay to Charles, in case Charles or someone with him reads this:
I met Charles at Lexington in April of 2009. He and I are friends.
We are also fellow Marines and fellow sergeants. I want nothing more
than to see a peaceful resolution to this situation, and will serve, if
asked, as a go between to facilitate his safe return. I believe he is
innocent of all the charges against him. Charles, if you get this
message, please turn yourself in to the local police station. My main
concern is for your safety.
We here at Oath Keepers don't want to
see anyone hurt, and we hope that Charles Dyer will simply turn himself
in, and face trial. We think he is innocent of the charges against
him, and that he has a very good chance of prevailing at trial.
While
Charles Dyer never became a member of Oath Keepers, he attended our
April 19, 2009 gathering in Lexington, Massachusetts, and we considered
him for the position of Liaison to the United States Marine Corps.
Below is our previous statement, by Oath Keepers President Stewart
Rhodes, about Charles Dyer and his association with Oath Keepers:
"Charles Dyer never became an actual member of Oath Keepers. I met
him when he attended our April 19, 2009 gathering at Lexington, and back
then I considered him for a position as our liaison to the Marine
Corps, but I decided against that when he made it clear he intended to
train and help organize private militias across the country when he got
out of the Marines. I considered such plans to be incompatible with the
Oath Keepers mission and goals, and certainly incompatible with any
leadership position within this org. He understood and agreed with my
decision to not have him become officially involved with Oath Keepers.
So, he was never a member, and never in any leadership position."
That
statement was issued last year to clear up misconceptions about Charles
Dyer's relationship with Oath Keepers. And here is a new statement by
Stewart Rhodes:
Early on, Charles Dyer supported the mission
of Oath Keepers, including encouraging his Youtube audience to attend
our gathering on Lexington Green, April 19, 2009. As already noted, he
also attended that rally and I spoke to him about the possibility of
serving as our national liaison to the Marine Corps once he got out of
the Marines. At that time he told me of his intent to train and help
establish private militias when he was discharged from the Corps. I let
him know that such a course of action would be incompatible with a
position within Oath Keepers. He understood. Over the next few months,
we kept in touch and I tried to change his mind, since I thought his
abilities could be best used in outreach to the current serving, but he
would not relent, and we both agreed that it would be best if he did not
join Oath Keepers. He went his own way.
As
with Jay, I urge Charles to turn himself in and face trial. He has
already prevailed in federal court, being found innocent of the federal
destructive device possession charges. He also secured a hung jury in
the April, 2011 trial on these state felony charges. He obviously has
competent legal counsel and he has a very good chance of prevailing at
this new trial on the state sexual assault charges, if he will simply
turn himself in. It is not too late to do so. Charles, if you read
this, please turn yourself in, and go to trial. I know you feel like
the authorities are just plain out to get you, but you still have a good
chance of winning, and you are making a tragic mistake by not taking
that chance. Just walk into a local police department and turn
yourself over to the desk sergeant. That is the safest course. Go to
trial. - Stewart Rhodes
All readers, please spread this post far and wide, in the hope that Charles, or anyone who is in contact with him, will read it.
Oath Keepers
PS - Additional Personal Statement from Stewart Rhodes:
Speaking as an individual, not as the President of Oath Keepers, I also have this to say:
While
it is important to set the record straight about Charles not joining
Oath Keepers and taking his own chosen path, I do also want to state
that I believe he is innocent of the sexual abuse charges he currently
faces. While Charles was still on active duty, back in 2009, he told me
he had recently discovered his wife (now his ex-wife) was hanging out
with drug addicts in Oklahoma, which greatly upset Charles since he was
concerned about his daughter's safety. Charles told me that immediately
after he insisted that his estranged wife stop bringing their daughter
around people like that, she and her relatives tried to get Charles in
trouble with the Marine Corps by outing him as the "masked Marine" on
Youtube, calling his command and accusing him of making seditious
statements and conduct unbecoming of a service member. That attempt to
get him in trouble with his command failed, but it does show a pattern
of his ex-wife and her family trying to use the law as a weapon against
Charles. As a criminal defense lawyer, I have seen many examples of
disgruntled ex-wives using trumped up sexual abuse allegations as the
"nuclear option" in custody disputes. I believe that is what happened
to Charles. I believe he is completely innocent of the charges against
him, and not only in the sense of being innocent until proven guilty,
but also in the absolute sense of not having done it. Given what
Charles told me about the past behavior of his ex-wife and her family,
and after having looked Charles in the eye, I find the sexual abuse
allegations ludicrous. - Stewart Rhodes
posted 08-23-2011 03:26 PM
I think Deb Swan did a very good job with the media on this one. They
tried to twist it a bit, but she got the main part of the message
through. If anyone is giving RT interviews, it ought to be her.
The
reason Jason Hicks wants her to remain on the "BOLO" is that he wants
her to remain on the hitilist, but the feds already went to the catch,
release, and monitor phase with her.
It is also a clear
demonstration of malicious hostility on the part of the DA toward Dyer
and his supporters. Swan has already been taken and held at gunpoint,
and that's not good enough for the prick, because she was not shot on
the spot, so he wants her to stay on the list so that someone can do it
again and he hopes he can "make an example of some people". I have seen
this when prosecutors get ticked off, they want the indictments and
killings to grow to a bigger proportion.
That said, if someone
does a citizens arrest of Mr Dyer, they should be aware that actually
handing him over to those who demonstrated the means and willingess to
kill him may in turn be considered an illegal act. I would have to look
up the local statutes, but there were several laws to that effect
ramrodded through most southern legislatures in the early part of the
civil rights movement due to the common practice down there of klansmen,
posses, and local law enforcement arresting blacks and malcontents and
then handing them off to whichever appropriate group for a lynching of
one kind or another. Sometimes it was a "legal lynching" in a court,
and sometimes just handled on someone's private ranch with a bonfire and
beer. Other times, masked men would handle the lynching in a very
public place, take pictures hold a party, and then take their masks off
to join the party later, with the masks just being a technicality for
some of the pictures.
If some non-government groups were to
start trolling the areas where he is spotted, it is legally defensible
to take him into protective custody and transport him or hold him at a
safe location until there are sufficient guarantees out of Oklahoma to
ensure his safety and a fair trial, not more threats of jail yard
lynchings, isolation cell starvation, or killing him in front of his
mother.
-------------------- Life liberty, and the pursuit of those who threaten them.
posted 08-23-2011 05:09 PM
I guess one question to ask is, why did Deborah Swan contact the Lawton Constitution, and not the Duncan Banner or any of the news organizations around the Houston area?
It's
possible that she did, of course, and the other news organizations
simply chose not to run the story. And if they had no way to verify
that she was who she claimed to be, they would probably have good reason
not to.
A whole lot of people familiar with this case are just
walking around scratching their heads and wondering what the hell is
going on. I should know, I'm one of them.
Onward and upward, airforce
Posts: 8155 | From: Tulsa | Registered: Jan 2002
|
quote: FBI agents in Oklahoma City hope to catch an ex-Marine fugitive through digital billboards.
The
FBI, Oklahoma City Division, will launch the digital billboards in 12
states in an effort to find Charles Alan Dyer. The 31-year-old ex-Marine
from Duncan is wanted by the FBI for unlawful flight to avoid
prosecution.
According the Stephens County Sheriff's Office, Dyer
was scheduled to be in court on August 15 on charges he raped a
7-year-old family member. However, he didn't show up for court.
A
warrant for his arrest was issued on August 17. According police, they
received information Dyer was in the Houston, Texas area. After combing
the area in Houston, Dyer was not found.
According to the FBI,
Dyer is considered armed and dangerous. It's believed he has several
weapons and traveling throughout the southeastern portion of the United
States.
Digital billboards with Dyer's picture will be
continuously displayed in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina
and South Carolina.
But as the FBI intensifies it's efforts,
Dyer's online supporters seem to be doing the same. On the web site for
the American Resistance Movement a Houston-based member is threatening
to kill FBI agents involved in the hunt for Dyer.
Still agent
Simmons says although Charles Dyer has the potential to be dangerous he
hasn't proven to be. He was last spotted in Houston on Sunday in the
truck of an elderly man who offered to take him to another city.
"He
had the opportunity to assault the man and steal his truck to cause
harm to him but he didn't," said Agent Simmons. "He got up and left."
Dyer's family says the former marine is simply running for his life.
Dyer's
mother gave News 9 a lengthy letter saying the girl Dyer accused of
raping denied it happened and Dyer ran because he thought he was
suspected of arson.
"We have taught our children a respect and
love for this country and a respect for the judicial system ....were we
wrong?" she writes.
In a letter Dyer wrote to his family the day
he disappeared he said the government is trying to kill him and if he
doesn't come home in 90 days he is dead.
A reward of up to $5,000 is offered for any information leading to the arrest of Dyer.
Dyer
is described as a white man, 5'10" to 6'0," 175 to 200 pounds, brown
hair (shaved) and blue eyes. However, it is believed he may have grown a
beard, lost some weight and his head is no longer shaved.
Anyone
with information regarding the whereabouts of Charles Alan Dyer should
contact police or call the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI. You may remain
anonymous.
Read the comments at the end of the article. We're not the only ones who are skeptical of the "official" story.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment